🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.