🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam order, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to implement a revised congressional boundary scheme that is projected to include several five new conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 decision, issued on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to overturn a lower court's ruling that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Justices' Rationale

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disrupting the sensitive balance of power in elections, the order stated in explaining its action.

The federal court had determined that Texas had likely classified voters according to their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the boundaries. It had instructed the state to revert to the districts drawn after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Strong Dissenting Opinion

Through a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's ruling. She contended that it disrespected the work of the district court, pointing out that its opinion was actually authored by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared year in and year out, is a infraction of the law of the land.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Fight

The ruling comes amid a countrywide contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a slim Republican control. Usually, map-drawing happens after a new decade's census. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to proceed with a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that might create a number of additional GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, in response, have responded with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas attorney general hailed the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order upheld Texas's basic authority to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes favorable to Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he remarked.

In contrast, opposition party representatives criticized the ruling. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the head of a major party election organization.

A leading House leader argued the court had yet again damaged its legitimacy by approving a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he added.