🔗 Share this article

The recent US national security strategy presents a flawed assessment of the European Union. It claims that open-border policies and what it terms "progressive" policies pose an existential risk to European civilization. Yet, this argument rests on a serious misinterpretation of the situation. The true challenge confronting Europe is not cultural but technological and economic backwardness.

A Glaring Growth Gap Between the US and Europe

Statistics paint a stark picture. Between 2008 and 2023, American economic output surged by 87%, while a mere 13.5% growth for the EU. Over this period, EU GDP per capita dropped from over three-quarters to just 50% of the American figure. Remarkably, even Mississippi now has a higher per capita income than major European economies like Italy and France.

Currently, about 50% of the world’s 50 largest technology firms are American, while a mere four are European.

The Technological Shortfall: The Core Question

The growing economic gap stems from superior productivity growth in the United States, largely due to technological innovation and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of world technology dominance is overwhelmingly US-centric. Over the past five decades, hundreds of American startups have grown into enterprises valued at more than ten billion dollars, versus only fourteen in the European continent.

This disparity raises a vital issue: As the competition for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, where does Europe positioned? Experts widely concede it is essentially a two-horse race between the US and China, with European nations entering at a clear disadvantage.

Root Causes of the Continent's Technological Lag

Several key reasons explain this technological divide.

• Venture Capital: The US boasts a much more robust and more dynamic system for financing new ventures. Europe has yet to establish a true capital markets union, a factor that limits the growth potential of emerging companies.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided regulation hamper European business. A US startup can introduce a product under one regulatory framework to access a market of hundreds of millions. The European Union, despite a larger population size, is divided among twenty-seven different national systems, creating significant market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Attitudes toward entrepreneurial failure differ sharply. In parts of Europe, business failure was historically met with penalties, whereas in the United States, it is often seen as a valuable lesson.
• Military Investment: The US benefits from a deeply integrated academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's chronic underinvestment in defense has eroded its capacity for pioneering research.

A Path Forward: Grounds for Hopefulness

Despite these challenges, there are causes for hope. Policymakers are increasingly aware of the severe threat and have started to propose serious reform. Notable analyses on EU competitiveness and the internal market highlight the necessity of major reforms.

With the right policies and rule changes, these assets might enable far greater degrees of commercial innovation.

Europe still possesses significant strengths: high-quality workforce, excellent schools and universities, and premier labs. Alongside a vast domestic consumer base and substantial household savings, these foundations have the potential to trigger a new wave of venture creation.

Crucially, even if the EU does not become the leader in creating next-generation technologies, it can still significantly increase productivity by implementing and tailoring advancements from other regions.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now faces a decisive crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". So far, Europe's technological decline has been gradual. However, if it fails to take bold steps to address its structural weaknesses, today's slow erosion could turn into a rapid and permanent loss of global economic relevance.